<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone: A whole new chapter in user experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2007/08/31/iphone-a-whole-new-chapter-in-user-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2007/08/31/iphone-a-whole-new-chapter-in-user-experience/</link>
	<description>News and ideas on user experience.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:36:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HR</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2007/08/31/iphone-a-whole-new-chapter-in-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>HR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/2007/08/31/iphone-a-whole-new-chapter-in-user-experience/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>**Only when the first graphical web browser, Mosaic, brought images and clickable hypertext to our screens, did the internet was finally go mainstream.**

Just to be picky, I think the Internet went mainstream when they allowed its commercial use. I think it was until 1994 or 95 that the Internet was for non-commercial purposes and commercial purposes were forbidden.

I might be completely wrong, though. I can&#039;t remember my sources. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>**Only when the first graphical web browser, Mosaic, brought images and clickable hypertext to our screens, did the internet was finally go mainstream.**</p>
<p>Just to be picky, I think the Internet went mainstream when they allowed its commercial use. I think it was until 1994 or 95 that the Internet was for non-commercial purposes and commercial purposes were forbidden.</p>
<p>I might be completely wrong, though. I can't remember my sources. <img src='http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Storey</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2007/08/31/iphone-a-whole-new-chapter-in-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Storey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/2007/08/31/iphone-a-whole-new-chapter-in-user-experience/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Apple outselling Microsoft on their first try? That&#039;s the value of the right user experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Apple also is also hoping to demonstrate that UX can also command a premium unit price as well as improving volumes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They are insisting this is a full price phone, and that it will not be subsidised, as phones normally are on mobile tariffs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They appear to have sold enough to prove their point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The networks love it, because they don&#039;t have to subsidise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And apple is extracting a kickback from the ARPU too - as part of their exclusivity deals. Which I doubt the networks love.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They argue that what the networks would have thrown away as subsidy they should give to apple -&lt;br /&gt;
of course, they can only do this because the handset demonstrably steals customers from other networks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hard to know if this model will outlast the initial enthusiasm.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple outselling Microsoft on their first try? That's the value of the right user experience.</p>
<p>But Apple also is also hoping to demonstrate that UX can also command a premium unit price as well as improving volumes.</p>
<p>They are insisting this is a full price phone, and that it will not be subsidised, as phones normally are on mobile tariffs</p>
<p>They appear to have sold enough to prove their point.</p>
<p>The networks love it, because they don't have to subsidise.</p>
<p>And apple is extracting a kickback from the ARPU too - as part of their exclusivity deals. Which I doubt the networks love.</p>
<p>They argue that what the networks would have thrown away as subsidy they should give to apple -<br />
of course, they can only do this because the handset demonstrably steals customers from other networks.</p>
<p>Hard to know if this model will outlast the initial enthusiasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

