<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#039;t (just) design what your users want</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2008/04/01/dont-just-design-what-your-users-want/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2008/04/01/dont-just-design-what-your-users-want/</link>
	<description>News and ideas on user experience.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:36:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Ladomery</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2008/04/01/dont-just-design-what-your-users-want/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Ladomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/2008/04/01/dont-just-design-what-your-users-want/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>You mention Alexander&#039;s pattern language in a previous post and that made me think about my years studying architecture and how so much focus was on what had already been built and the teachings of the great architects.

In architecture, more than web design, you have to design for the user. And you have to get it right first time.

This explains why architecture students are encouraged to copy from successful designs and why book such as A Pattern Language become established points of reference.

Donald Norman&#039;s reasoning is valid but he is also trying to sell you a service.

David Heinemeier, as you say, is his own target audience and therefore knows exactly what needs to be done.

The rest of us have the option of either employing the likes of Donald Norman and/or learn from what has been built before, what is tried and tested and works well.

I would add this to your final list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention Alexander's pattern language in a previous post and that made me think about my years studying architecture and how so much focus was on what had already been built and the teachings of the great architects.</p>
<p>In architecture, more than web design, you have to design for the user. And you have to get it right first time.</p>
<p>This explains why architecture students are encouraged to copy from successful designs and why book such as A Pattern Language become established points of reference.</p>
<p>Donald Norman's reasoning is valid but he is also trying to sell you a service.</p>
<p>David Heinemeier, as you say, is his own target audience and therefore knows exactly what needs to be done.</p>
<p>The rest of us have the option of either employing the likes of Donald Norman and/or learn from what has been built before, what is tried and tested and works well.</p>
<p>I would add this to your final list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

