<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tower Bridge starts to Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2008/06/05/tower-bridge-starts-to-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2008/06/05/tower-bridge-starts-to-twitter/</link>
	<description>News and ideas on user experience.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:36:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Whittle</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkflowinteractive.com/2008/06/05/tower-bridge-starts-to-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>David Whittle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/2008/06/05/tower-bridge-starts-to-twitter/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not strictly true that Tower Bridge is telling us about itself, though I like the illusion that it is. As Tom Armitage (
http://infovore.org/) puts it:

&quot;The idea of overhearing machines talking about what they’re doing is, to my mind, quite delightful.&quot;

In fact credit goes to Tom and his collaborators for taking what he calls an &quot;untapped data source&quot; (http://is.gd/qHZ) and turning it into something like a living thing. Bravo.

The moral of the story (there&#039;s always a moral) is that there is lots of static, &quot;untapped&quot; data out there that can be brought to life with a bit of inspiration, a little clever coding, and a well-designed interaction model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not strictly true that Tower Bridge is telling us about itself, though I like the illusion that it is. As Tom Armitage (<br />
<a href="http://infovore.org/)" rel="nofollow">http://infovore.org/)</a> puts it:</p>
<p>"The idea of overhearing machines talking about what they’re doing is, to my mind, quite delightful."</p>
<p>In fact credit goes to Tom and his collaborators for taking what he calls an "untapped data source" (<a href="http://is.gd/qHZ" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/qHZ</a>) and turning it into something like a living thing. Bravo.</p>
<p>The moral of the story (there's always a moral) is that there is lots of static, "untapped" data out there that can be brought to life with a bit of inspiration, a little clever coding, and a well-designed interaction model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

