hello@flow-interactive.com flow-interactive.com @flowinteractive Flow

iPad usability testing: adapting lab set up to a lean back device

The Nielsen Norman group published reports on the usability of iPad Apps and websites that was widely read. But did their lab setup really reflect how people use the device? For a recent project we chose to set up our lab differently.

Observe others use an iPad "in the wild", take a look at Apple's guided tours or simply use one yourself. You will reach the same conclusion: the iPad is not a table-top device. It is meant to be held in your hands, not lying flat on a surface. Yet this is precisely the way the N/N group conducted their testing: with the device lying on its back under a document camera.

At Flow we understand that this is an unrealistic setup, and have arranged our own lab to match the way people actually hold their iPad.

We recently tested an iPad app for watching videos. We realised that this application was likely to be used while comfortably seated in a sofa. So we brought a sofa to allow this in our lab too.

Then came the question of what should be recorded during the sessions. For a typical website testing session, we use a desktop computer with Morae to record the participant's screen and a picture of their face via a webcam.

There are now options to get the iPad screen replicated on a external monitor for viewing or recording. But these involve plugging a cable in the device, which restricts how the device can be held, so we decided against it.

Instead, we used a camera located behind the sofa to take an over-the-shoulder look at the iPad screen. This also allowed us to also capture how the device is being held, what the user hands are doing, and what the user’s hands hide. These are essential to understand how a touch screen interface is reacting.

To also capture the facial expression of participants, we used another webcam that was positioned on a coffee table in front of the sofa.

By allowing the participants to hold the device how they would at home, we can take away some of the awkwardness of the lab setting, observe a more authentic experience and potentially discover issues that wouldn't have surfaced otherwise.

4 comments

4 Comments so far

  1. Ruairi Galavan August 9th, 2011 16:29 pm PDT

    Hi Fabien,

    Nice post. Have you any pictures of the setup, screenshots, or sample video you would be willing to post or share?

    Ruairí

  2. Ankush August 16th, 2011 15:05 pm PDT

    Hi Fabien,

    As I communicated on Twitter, our own findings are different:
    1. iPad becomes uncomfortable for more than 10 mins off table. So, people prefer a mix of off and on table experience.
    2. Browsing is off table, but viewing content was largely on table.

    In fact, Apple should make iPad more handy, since its an irritation to hold it at an angle for long periods.

    Also, I would love to view your step-up. Thanks for sharing your views.

    Ankush.

  3. Thomas Davies August 24th, 2011 16:21 pm PDT

    Nice article.

    Will you be looking at the wireless mirroring to an AppleTV in the next version of iOS?

    While placing a camera behind the user is a great way to record their actions, I struggled to get a clear view of the screen due to glare etc.

  4. Fabien September 15th, 2011 13:14 pm PDT

    >Ruairi:
    Sorry we -stupidly- forgot to take picture of the set-up when we did it, and real research video is data protected / confidential.

    >Ankush:
    My point isn't so much on table VS off table, it's about letting user use the device as they would naturally.

    >Thomas:
    Glare can indeed be a problem with these screen, during research I switched off the ceiling lights.

    Wireless mirroring is interesting... On the plus side you get a great view on what's on screen, on the minus, you loos the view on how people use the iPad and what they do with their hands.

Leave a reply